,
Views: 37408,
Hodnocení: ,
Tags: Apollo, moonlanding, russians, moon, hoax, conspiracy, theory, NASA, astronaut,
This is the third in a series of videos explaining the basic evidence that proves we landed on the moon in 1969 and thereafter. Movie #3 deals with our space race competitors, the Russians, the only other country even close to a moonlanding, and how they admit to every aspect of our men on the moon. They are the ones to know.
As a Science Teacher at heart, I was personally disgusted at the ridiculous preponderance of "APOLLO WAS A HOAX" websites proported by those who are the most ill-informed and conspiracy minded of our society. Certain science teachers have complained to NASA that this hysteria has gone on long enough, and I happen to agree. This is my response.
Here are the positive and proactive pieces of evidence that the hoax believers always try to avoid like the plague. These are definitive areas of examination that are tangible, touchable, and open for scientific debate. The hoax believers might be really proud of their lost shadows, wrong reflections, and scrubbed sand; but now, here is the evidence that is up to them to DISPROVE, the evidence they coincidentally forget to mention on nearly every webpage or TV special I have come across, and we have to wonder why.
I originally aimed these movies at a high school audience, students untainted by the paranoid minutia of the hoax believers, students who are simply looking to find the truth for themselves in a sea of misinformation. As such I do not address every nickel and dime screwball argument, as they are exactly that: screwball arguments enacted only by the dimwitted who have only the most superficial science background whose main arguing tactic is merely to read someone else's webpage and parrot it verbatim. Hearing a big word on TV and then repeating it in an effort to sound smart is not debating, its begging for attention.
I originally made these 4 years ago as a project for my Educational Technology graduate course. As such they are a little rougher around the edges than my more recent productions, which is why I posted them under this name rather than my real name SpreadingTheMuse. Look under that name to find my current productions such as Mathematics videos. If the demand is good enough, I can produce more videos debunking virtually any topic that can be brought up.
Conspiracy lunatics, you arent really welcome here, and I will delete any post where it is obvious that you are just repeating big words you read somewhere else attempting to sound smarter than you actually are.
Komentáře & Download
zLukkee - 16.5.2012 23:00:18
NASA lied to millions of people
SpreadingtheMuse - 29.4.2012 16:02:56
So answer the question. If Russia could have been bought off the whole time, why bother "faking" a moonlanding to beat the Russians at all?
You're pushing two mutually contradictory stories.
MickeyMouseApollo - 28.4.2012 9:45:35
Negotiations of the deal the deal started in 1968 and was finalized in 1971 ,fucking retard.USA paid the USSR. Get over it.
Guy Tanzer - 28.4.2012 2:03:21
I did watch the movie, two weeks ago. I don't remember much of it because I don't waste a lot of brain cells on ridiculously stupid stuff. It was a waste of time then, and it would be a waste of time to watch it again now. But tell you what. I'll let you win, since it's obviously so important to you to win. You win. Feel better now?
SpreadingtheMuse - 28.4.2012 1:22:35
You didnt watch the movie and are just mouthing off like a tard. "Russian landing sites?" WTF? When and where does this movie claim the russians landed? Post the EXACT time right here and right now.
The movie said no such thing, meaning you made an idiot of yourself. Twice in one post ;)
SpreadingtheMuse - 28.4.2012 1:21:02
If you have no concept of "stock footage," then yes, you are an idiot, period. The video makes no claims as to what that rocket was, nor does it invalidate the point in any way.
NOR did you quote any source of any kind saying "stock footage is not allowed." Its a time-honored video tool used as long as there's been movies. Your ignorance of the medium is your own problem.
Then, WHAT "ridiculous" claim? That the russians admit we went? Find ONE NEWS RELEASE thats says they didnt. Anywhere
Guy Tanzer - 28.4.2012 0:50:56
And why, exactly, did the Soviets never publicize their successful landings? What did they gain or hope to gain by keeping it secret, and losing a major propaganda point to the USA? How did they send it out to the Moon in total secrecy and get it past the deep-space radar networks from several major nations? But why waste your time, and mine, by asking you to think?
Guy Tanzer - 28.4.2012 0:47:35
Oh, you post the wrong footage and don't point it out, and I'M the idiot. How does one prove something did NOT happen, by the way? Where is there any proof his ridiculous claims DID happen? His yapping about them? Well... maybe that's good enough proof for you, but some of us have higher standards. Okay. What rocket, exactly, did the Soviets use to get to and from the Moon? The N-1 which blew up on every launch? Where are their landing sites on the Moon?
SpreadingtheMuse - 27.4.2012 19:43:58
"USSR Grain" shoots down your OWN dumb idea. For if the USSR could have been bought off the whole time, WTF have a space race at all???
The whole point was to beat the russians, but now you change your story. Let us know when you can say something consistent ;)
SpreadingtheMuse - 27.4.2012 19:42:25
"another rocket" errr, its called "stock footage" my dear idiot. WTF does it matter what rocket he shows launching if his point is something else entirely? A point which you, coincidentally, failed to refute in any way shape or form? Dont waste our time.
FrankaDith - 23.4.2012 14:14:48
They kept a close eye on that man and others all their live,s like parolee,s .
I say let,s call it a cluster fuck of a mess and close at that.
wardog1967 - 23.4.2012 11:52:52
The Americans did not STEAL ANY scientists. Wernher Von Braun SURRENDERED to the Americans just as Nazi Germany was about to be overrun by the allies near the end of WW2. He was forced to work on the Nazi V2 rockets, but wanted to put man in space. Clearly he chose going to the Americans over the Russians. The Russians FORCED the German engineers to work on rockets after they were captured. Good choice, I say!
wardog1967 - 23.4.2012 11:39:54
Good work Muse :)
Guy Tanzer - 8.4.2012 0:13:30
It's certainly interesting that the fool narrating this laughable 'documentary' deliberately slips misleading information in to inflate his claim. He shows a Soviet "Proton" liftoff while talking about another Soviet rocket entirely to connect them in ignorant people's minds. The Proton flew pretty reliably but was far too small to be used for a moon landing. The N-1 meant to do the moon flights was test flown four times and blew up within 2 minutes on all four flights. Deceit or idiocy?
crossman3940 - 6.4.2012 19:17:31
they cant get passed the ionesphere
sinclair61 - 4.4.2012 19:00:51
I believe myself and I say I am dubious, to say the least that the technology available in ´69 was good enough to do what was is claimed to have been done.
MickeyMouseApollo - 29.3.2012 0:35:34
Also google"soviet grain" to see why the ussr silence.
MickeyMouseApollo - 29.3.2012 0:34:14
Down the hatch before the ignition and lift off.
watch?v=J9OOvmGUYdE
SpreadingtheMuse - 10.3.2012 6:23:10
Well its stupendously easy for you to refute fanny. All you have to do is link a single press release where the Russian gov went on record to say "fake." You could have that whipped out in 60 sec or less.
But thing is, the Russians never made any such claim. Or else the hoax dorks would have been shoving it in our face for 40 years.
So, believe the Russians, with their engineers and rocket scientists, or believe the ranks of GED hoax 40 year-old virgins. Easy ;)
occhamite - 10.3.2012 4:07:27
You deny the Apollo landings yet it seems that you must be on some other planet. If you had bothered to do any checking, you'd find numerous references to statements by Alexei Leonov that he watched the landings live, via a separate down link through the Soviet DSN: 'The two Side Of The Moon'"; or watch?v=X55bRwXlWBM ; or rt. com/news/i-armstrong-bouncing-moon/?fu%20llstory
Leonov refers to deniers as "глупые люди" (stupid people) quote from the rt.com article: (continued)
occhamite - 10.3.2012 4:06:17
(2of2) Leonov: "...Radars were monitoring the whole process. When the ship landed, their external cameras began to show the surroundings. We saw it all. ...Armstrong goes down the steps. The last step was about 50 cm above the Moon's surface. He was moving his foot carefully. We all froze, waiting to see what was going to happen next. He jumped off the step, then bounced and began to walk. He had an antenna that transmitted everything to the Earth; we saw everything that they did..."
fanbutton - 4.3.2012 8:29:03
Notice how this joker conveniently left out one very important detail in his C and B allegation. He said that the russians admitted that we landed men on the Moon first. However, he failed to state any names, agencies, or affiliations that may have made this ludicrous stipulation. This is what we call American propaganda at its silliest.
SpreadingtheMuse - 18.2.2012 21:50:40
Bad green screen is still infinitely better than all the wannabe newbs who just stick their face in front of a poorly lit webcam and pretend that makes them youtube geniuses.
Give him credit for trying harder.
Cosmored2 - 7.2.2012 17:38:29
The Americans didn't go to the moon either. NASA faked the Apollo moon missions in a studio. Here's a link to some of the evidence.
spurstalk (dot) com/forums/showthread (dot) php?t=144487
audiotrax2000 - 4.2.2012 1:23:46
Worst green screen ever.